Hockliffe – Residential; Site For Travelling Showpeople

80 Signatures | Petition Ended

Created February 11, 2015 by Concerned Neighbour

Housing

There is currently a planning application with central bedfordshire council for the following:

application: cb/15/00150/full

registration date:
30 / 01 / 2015

parish name:
eggington

location:
hawthorns, leighton road, eggington, leighton buzzard, lu7 9ne

statutory class:
change of use

proposal:
use of land for mixed purposes: residential; site for travelling showpeople; maintenance, repair and storage of vehicles and equipment; paddock. Case officer:
vicki davies

decision:
this case has not yet been decided

This petition is now closed and is no longer accepting signatures!



There are currently 80 signatures for this petition:

  1. Danny

    NO!

  2. Caroline wallis UNITED KINGDOM

    I object the area is already over populated and does not have facilities that is satisfactory for the residents. We have no shops local no amenities for children to keep them off the street.

  3. Colleen griffin UNITED KINGDOM

    No thanks

  4. Paul UNITED KINGDOM

    No thanks, there are enough traveller sites as it is around the leighton buzzard area

  5. Gavin White UNITED KINGDOM

    It’s been proven that crime rates increase in areas that are populated by “travellers” and I will sign anything that opposes their use of land in our area. I have paid to purchase a house in a nice area and I don’t want that reputation to be tarnished by these people.

  6. chris edwards UNITED KINGDOM

    To many traveller sites already.

  7. Aly

    I strongly object to this proposal – houses will fall in value, crime will rise and schools will be forced to take pupils on roll who will bring down the attendance percentages, lower overall attainment and increase challenging behaviour.

  8. Andrea UNITED KINGDOM

    Too many traveller sites in leighton Buzzard and surrounding areas already

  9. richard bright UNITED KINGDOM

    This is greenbelt agricultural land inappropriate for what is industrial use keep our countryside green

  10. Phil Cassia UNITED KINGDOM

    No Thanks

  11. Catherine Tidbury UNITED KINGDOM

    No thankyou! Beautiful countryside as you enter leighton buzzard from hockliffe.. Strongly object to such a proposal.

  12. Lynn Stewart

    A significant amount if land in the local area has already been allocated for the clipstone development as well the solar farm. Some green belt land needs to be left to maintain the rural nature of the area. I also think that an increase in traffic in and out of this site from Leighton Rd will be a hazard as this is 60 mph road.

  13. Matt

    NO THANKS, ENOUGH TRAVELLERS SITES IN THIS AREA ALREADY EXISTS!!

  14. Linda Doyle

    Surely there are already enough travellers sites already in this area that could be used rather than use green belt land. Obstruction on the roads with more traffic!

  15. Kevin Doyle

    Too much traffic, large vehicles on small winding roads. Green Belt land and lots of Travellers sites already available to be used in the area.

  16. Linda Doyle

    No need for further travellers sites in this area. This is green belt land, also would cause far too much chaos and traffic on the road.

  17. Alan Tew UNITED KINGDOM

    This small holding consisted of a house and outbuildings for agricultural use, the land has being aggressively developed far beyond its previous use without any consent, I can not seen any reasonably reason why retrospective consent would be given for the allocation of 60 carparking spaces and five residential dwellings, and associated outbuildings,

    The site would obviously be vulnerable to future gound water contamination from such a large number of vechicles, and the surface water on the site runs into a nearby brook.

    The proposed application is vague to say the least, there is no real distinction between what is there already, what has been illegally built prior 2008 when the development was supposedly completed and what will be there if retrospective planning is given. Tis a mystery.

    As you may guess I do protest and I shall not be giveing this particular application my blessing, for the reasons listed by me and other residents,

  18. Chris UNITED KINGDOM

    NO, NO, NO, I strongly object to this proposal.
    There are enough sites around here we definitely don’t need another one.

  19. Don UNITED KINGDOM

    I object to this proposal in the strongest terms.

  20. Chris UNITED KINGDOM

    NO, NO, NO, I strongly object to this proposal.
    Enough is enough, there are too many around here already!!!!

Page 4 of 4«1234
Your Name*:
Your E-Mail:
Message*:

Add your Signature...

Sign with Facebook
Or enter your details below…